It takes a spot of courage to stand up tall and a bit of derring-do to rise when you fall

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

The Possible Price Of Doing Right

By now many people have heard the story---especially you fellow People readers---about Teri Hatcher's brave admission and honorable deed. I read it first in our newspapers here since the event it was linked to took place approximately ten minutes from where I live.

Several years ago, a young teenage girl took her own life, leaving a note implying that a neighbor man---a trusted family friend---would know why she felt that ending her life was the only answer to her situation, her pain. Revelations of molestation quickly followed but there was nothing really to prove it and soon the man was going to walk. Until Teri Hatcher (of Desperate Housewives fame) courageously stepped forward and contacted our local police. She revealed that when she was young, this same man---who had once been married to her aunt---had also molested her. Her statement, her willingness to be a witness, caused the man in question to plead guilty, and he's now behind bars where he belongs. Disgustingly, however, he "has shown a remarkable lack of remorse."

One thing that struck me about this story was the fact that Ms. Hatcher had to pause and consider how much damage such a step would do to her career. Would stories circulate that she'd stepped forward to boost her at-the-time flagging career? Would there be suspicion of an ulterior motive? I'm glad that despite those possibilities---the possible negative impact to her livelihood---she made the right decision. They say without her testimony they wouldn't have had enough to convict.

It's too bad that anyone has to consider whether doing the right thing will be a bad move. It's too bad that Hollywood is so shallow that it's a real possibility to be an outcast because you revealed something ugly from your past---something that you had no power or control over. Something that someone else did. Something that you conquered and rose above and became strong despite its happening.

Hopefully more people will have the courage to do what might be hard if it means saving a child, saving anyone. Hopefully we as a society can judge less harshly the stain of rape and molestation and similar abuses and remember that the victim is a victim. Hopefully coming forward to help can be a badge of honor and not a cause for dismissal.

11 Comments:

Blogger Lori Stewart Weidert said...

She did the right thing, yes.

However, I find that posing on the cover of a Vanity Fair wearing little-to-nothing while the cover story screams "I was molested" very incongruous.

A serious message she's trying to put out there, and yet they still pay homage to "sex sells" with cover photograph.

9:59 AM, March 22, 2006

 
Blogger Crystal said...

gnightgirl - good point.

10:10 AM, March 22, 2006

 
Blogger jay are said...

good point indeed, and that very point was actually written about as well and discussed. Seems like an odd message to send considering the main subject matter.

10:21 AM, March 22, 2006

 
Blogger Marcella Chester said...

Excellent post, Jay.

On the comments about the Vanity Fair cover, the issue is a bigger one. This situation just makes that "sex sells" message glaringly obvious.

11:35 AM, March 22, 2006

 
Blogger Unknown said...

That anyone who was abused, especially as a child, need worry about the consequences of reporting that abuse seems to me to be a terrible commentary on our society. Had Terry and the tragic young girl who took her own life been beaten or robbed by that pervert, the issue of reporting it would not have come up. Yet, because the crime had to do with sex, there was a reluctance to disclose it.

My ex-wife and her three sisters were each sexually abused by their father from the time they were pre-schooler until literally they were teenagers and escaped from the home. When she was in her thirties, married and with children—and after almost ten years of psychotherapy—my ex-wife did report the abuse to authorities. That led to the prosecution of her father under Kentucky’s delayed prosecution law. He was convicted and spent eleven years in prison. Yet, even then, only one of her three sisters was willing to testify.

As a social worker and therapist, I have worked with many victims (survivors) of sexual abuse. The issues surrounding divulging the crime go far beyond the consideration “damage such a step would do to her career.” They involve very strong feelings the victims have, such as fear that they were to blame, self-guilt, and—especially—shame. This, I believe, is what the news media should have centered upon, not that Teri was an actress, famous, or had possible selfish motives, which are all bullshit.

8:29 AM, March 23, 2006

 
Blogger jay are said...

thank you, Nick, for your great comment and insight. I'm sad about your ex-wife but I'm glad that she has found, in part, some sort of recovery. What is lost because of sexual abuse is never fully recovered but great strides can be made and life can be good.

11:31 AM, March 23, 2006

 
Blogger Michelle said...

I wonder if she's ever heard of a conscience.....*shakes* head

10:28 PM, March 23, 2006

 
Blogger Left Coast Sister said...

V. interesting comments, all... With regard to the incongruency of the mag. cover, I agree on one hand. It's irritating how sex sells everything. On the other hand, a sexual abuse survivor is allowed to be a multi-faceted person, and a sexual one at that. The objectification of women on a societal level is a whole other subject. Let's be real... She's on a show that is completely sexual in premise, right? So it would be a little weird if she was on a cover dressed very primly. I guess my comment stems from the "if she's ___, then she can't be ___" line of thought, which is really a dangerous path to tread. Are we going to say that she's either not a victim of abuse if she'd dress like that, or that she's "asking for it" because she's dressed like that? (I know that's not what you're saying, gnightgirl!) It's great that she came forward. But that aside, Teri Hatcher is an actress, a sister, a daughter, etc etc and being a survivor shouldn't enfringe on the rest of her person. Just my thoughts...

8:03 AM, March 24, 2006

 
Blogger jay are said...

thanks for your insight, left-coast...

11:06 AM, March 24, 2006

 
Blogger Lois Lane said...

Her courage is what is important. What she wears is being misinterpreted. Molestation for so many means the body is ugly, shame, a tainted person, keep the dirty secret hidden, ect. That is what the photo is trying to show. I think, regardless of what she looks like on the cover, she did the right thing.
Lois Lane

8:11 AM, March 25, 2006

 
Blogger Admin said...

She has shown courage to speak up.
Sex does sell, we as survivors must let it been know to society our bodies are not for sale! The article in Vanity does take away from an important message!
Rapes, incest, sex abuse, are still crimes!!

1:23 PM, March 25, 2006

 

Post a Comment

<< Home